| Home |
|
|
|
Strategies for
implementing the requirements of Article 11 (3) l of the
30 November
2009 marked the completion of the Ufoplan
research project “Strategies for implementing the requirements and objectives
of the EU Water Framework Directive aimed at preventing and minimising the
consequences of unexpected water pollution arising from technical
installations”. It provides general proposals, with examples of measures,
for solutions in a field of water conservation that has hitherto received
little attention in connection with the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
Moreover, it makes a close examination of the aspect of cost-effectiveness and
proportionality which is also called for in the WFD.
Background
Following
the entry into force of Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD), water bodies in the European
Union are to be managed in accordance with a uniform legal framework. The goal
of such management is to achieve good ecological and good chemical status of
the water bodies in the Community by 2015. One major instrument for achieving
the goal is programmes of measures which together form part of the management
plans due to start in 2010. Article 11 (3) WFD defines the
minimum requirements for the measures designed to achieve the environmental
objectives. Paragraph (3) l requires measures to prevent significant
losses of pollutants from technical installations and to prevent and reduce the
impact of accidental pollution incidents, including unforeseeable accidents
which have already occurred. Such measures are also to make use of systems to
detect or give warning of such events. This aspect has not been accorded great
priority and has received little detailed attention in draft management plans
to date.
Results
Based on an
inventory of existing and planned activities in the International River Basin
Commissions for the Elbe, Oder, Danube and
Even in
“the days before the Water Framework Directive”, people made preparations for
harmful events and their consequences in lakes and rivers, and they took
numerous measures which in some cases varied considerably from one region to
another. For example, implementation of
Article 11 (3) l WFD calls not so much for concepts that
completely reinvent risk management, but rather for checklists or lists of
measures that act as a guide to identifying any deficits that may still exist.
For a concept of this kind, the project set outs the risk management system for
the surface water path in the form of a graphic “Safety Chain” based on a
chronological causal flow chart – from strategic precautions through damage
containment to after-care measures. This safety chain is broken down into six
action levels that are further differentiated with the aim of making it
possible to identify individual measures relevant to
Article 11 (3) l WFD. A schematic description is provided
in Part II of the final report, and the necessary explanations follow in
Part III.
This also
focuses particularly on the inclusion of cost-effectiveness and proportionality
aspects which is required by the WFD (not only, but also) in connection with
programmes of measures. This requirement, which is comparatively new to
environmental law, raises special problems in the field of precautions for
incidents that take place only rarely or may never take place at all. The
project discusses this with the aid of model calculations. This reveals that in
most cases in-depth analysis fails because of the inadequacy of the underlying
data.
The final
report is available in German and English, and the summary (Part I) also
exists in Russian. The texts can be downloaded here .
The project
was carried out by the
|
|||||||||||||||

